Associational Discrimination: Employers May Not Discriminate Against Employees "Associated With" Someone In A Protected Class

August 30, 2016

California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act not only protects from discrimination employees in certain specified protected classes, but also employees who are “merely associated with” someone in a protected class.  In an August 29, 2016 opinion, the California Court of Appeal for the Second District reversed an order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant employer, Dependable Highway Express, Inc. (DHE), and ordered the trial court to allow Plaintiff Luis Castro-Ramirez’s associational discrimination claim (and related claims) to proceed to trial.  [http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B261165A.PDF]. 

 

In Castro-Ramirez, the court confirmed and strengthened the protection available to employees associated with members of protected classes.  Plaintiff Castro-Ramirez’s son required daily dialysis which only Mr. Castro-Ramirez could administer.  The company accommodated this until a new supervisor took over and changed the plaintiff’s schedule.  He then terminated Mr. Castro-Ramirez for refusing to work a shift that did not permit him to be home in time for his son’s dialysis.

 

What can employees learn from this ruling? This case centers on disability, but the law’s protection against associational discrimination can extend to all protected classes.  An employee does not have to sever associations or relationships with a person based on the person’s disability, race, gender, or other protected characteristic.  An employer may not discriminate against an employee based on those associations.  Be aware of your rights and hold employers accountable if they violate them.      

 

This article is not intended to provide the reader with legal advice, as such advice requires careful consideration of each person’s individual facts and circumstances, and careful application of the law to those facts and circumstances.  Nor does this article create an attorney-client relationship with the author and any reader.  Such a relationship will only come to exist upon mutual execution of a legal services agreement.  http://www.holmquistlaw.com.  

Please reload

Featured Posts

California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) makes it unlawful for an employer to fire or discriminate against an employee because of the emplo...

Employees Alleging Discrimination Need Not Have Direct Evidence Of The Employer’s Discriminatory Motive; Circumstances Suggesting Discrimination Was A...

August 10, 2016

1/1
Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload

Archive
Please reload

Search By Tags
Please reload

Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square